Connections, Constellations. Chemicals.

HOW IS IT ALL BUILT. What is the shape of love as it moves through all existence? Does that mean carbon, helium, zine, gold, creatine, DHA, serotonin, all these have love in them? Does love come from within us? Where would it originate? We are the ones who feel love, our perspective on any situation can be either love or any myriad of emotion. So because it seems in our capacity to love, the function and origin of love is in us, our cells. Gold in you loves; zine has love; silver contains love. Every tissue and cell made up from their trillions of parts have love in them. So then do strings and quarks also have love? They must - if gold is made of atoms and we are made of those atoms, and we feel love, then quarks feel love also. 

Or, love comes from another source, and that love is endowed unto us. If so, we then connect to it as we fall in or give love, and because love comes and goes and it just happens, then that love must be everywhere, at all times. So either humans chose love, or it is given to them. Iin both cases, this act pursuable through switching perspectives gives zinc, gold, DHA the perception of participation, so those molecules and particles also love, only because of something else making them. They are in service of a connection of action, and their function is now cogged in the machine. They have to if we chose to participate, as they are the one participating with us.

Choice or Doing: either the capacity to love is writ by humans on the idea that love originates and emanates from our natural, Earthen selves, or we are presented with an A/B decision to love, making the author of said multiple choice a force outside ourselves. And what to be extrapolated from this inquiry if not that the very idea/feeling/truth of love is perceived; from our sensorial subjection, the species has attempts on record the world over in pursuit of describing the lived phenomena of love. History and herstory can be attributed to many a story about love. Greatness in loss, and achievement, can arguably be traced to the ideal of love permeating all goals and desires. So the rising inquiry becomes contextualized to cultural evolution. Love is perceived by humans and somewhat utilized to forward progress the species. Is it really something more than a human-centric motivational perspective? Does it come from a Divine source or have humans been conflating and grandstanding in the harnessing of this feeling turned concept - to then elevate personal or tribal success? Is the divine motivation to make humans dance the game of devotion, as the chess match of Time is played out by the granting instigator, who benefits only by our birth and death - because the more of us exist, the more chances for love. If it does come from within, at the subatomic level, then what goal other than reproduction would quarks and strings be aiming for? The detailed and intricate highway system of perception as hierarchical from cells up to eyeballs structures a gating system for a seeming reason: either quarks recognize energy and likeness of other quarks, or the functionality of quark love sublimates the need for the complexity of human design to filter all things into distilled feelings. And then these feelings are expressed in chemical terms, as more definable signaling of a perception becomes smaller and smaller interactions. I wonder why are chemicals the way they are - how come dopamine function like X and not Y? Is that a Divine maneuver, and X takes Y as the least resistive assignment? Or, are these parameters and designs of chemicals a larger version of quark love? Are we all the sizable, adaptive, carbon beings of quarks learning to love, and we masquerade on inquisitive rumination so feeble yet all encompassing?